The Chinese aim threats at western journalists. Again the western media comes under criticism in China. Nobody gains from slanted journalism, not the Han, not the Uyghurs, and not the West.
Until late at night on Sunday the 5th of July, when protests broke out in Ürümqi, capital of Xinjiang, the westernmost Chinese province, I was in touch with friends on the scene. Later that night telephone and internet connections to this place of the world were severed. I’ve not heard from my friends and acquaintances since then, and I have to rely on the international media for information from Ürümqi.
The rioting took place between Uyghurs and Han Chinese. The Han are familiar to the media. Last year they organised the Olympics. De Han fell victim to the earthquake in the southern province of Sichuan, and they were the ‘bad guys’ at the time of the Tibetan riots.
The Uyghurs draw less media attention than the Tibetans do, but their situation is comparable. The Uyghurs are one of many ethnic minorities in China but in Xinjiang, their native province, they form that largest ethnic group. Just like the Tibetans, Uyghurs feel their lifestyle and culture are under pressure due to mass migration of Han Chinese to Xinjiang.
Since I rely on the international media for information from Ürümqi it strikes me that the media is very ignorant about Chinese policies towards ethnic minorities. I read many inaccuracies in the reporting on the recent protests. Such untruthful journalism fuels anger amongst the Chinese about the West, which doesn’t seem prepared to take China seriously at all.
Take for example the 8-o’clock news on Monday the 6th of July. In an attempt to provide the context of the Ürümqi riots the NOS (Dutch Broadcast Foundation) asserts that frustration among Uyghurs is immense because “Tukish at school is prohibited” and “mosques have been closed down”. Both ‘facts’ are just not true.
In the case of Turkish education the controversy is largely contained within the Uyghur community. The Uyghur language is related to Turkish. Parents are free to decide to send their kids to Uyghur schools. Educated Uyghurs often choose to send their kids to Chinese schools though, because a Chinese education gives you much better career prospects. This situation upsets many traditional Uyghurs.
Visiting a mosque hasn’t been prohibited for several decades. Imams are under surveillance from the state and their education is tightly regulated by the government, but such ideas can be heard in the West as well. There are some exceptions however. Youngsters are prohibited from visiting a mosque, and students and civil servants are likewise prevented from practicing their religion.
In the same week de Volkskrant also didn’t take its journalistic responsibilities very seriously. In their front page article ‘Peking wil van geen leed horen’ they claim that the Chinese government forces Uyghurs into low-paid jobs on the Chinese east coast. It is certainly true that there are policies aimed at finding employment for Uyghurs. It may even be the case that some Uyghurs are ‘forced’ to accept such jobs because of their economic situation. But the government in Beijing forces nobody to make their money in this way. Other ethnic minorities and Han from economic backwaters are equally encouraged to migrate east and find jobs on the prosperous east coast.
A remark in Trouw that “the Chinese government depicts the Uyghurs in the media as dangerous terrorists related to Al-Qaeda” is similarly untrue. The opposite is the case. In an attempt to create a harmonious society, Beijing often depicts ethnic minorities as peaceful, traditional, even cute. Through this approach a lot of tourists are drawn to economically underdeveloped regions. Uyghurs are annoyed at being labelled as ‘cute’ and prefer social and cultural liberties rather then economic investment. The Han find the Uyghurs ungrateful. ‘Strike it rich first, and then we’ll discuss these other issues’, so say the Chinese.
Not all is well about Chinese policies towards ethnic minorities. But out of ignorance or sympathy the western media is too quick to judge ‘powerhouse China’. The Han find this very upsetting; they are annoyed at mistakes in western reporting on China.
This anger shouldn’t be underestimated. In the future China will think twice before it invites western journalists to ‘come and look for themselves’ when problems occur in the restive areas. The West, which would like to gain a foothold with their international human rights, takes a step back instead. And the Uyghurs? If the eye of the international community doesn’t reach into Xinjiang anymore, then they have much more to fear from the Chinese government. It’s in nobody’s interest to slant reporting on the Ürümqi riots. Everyone is better of when facts and opinions are reported as accurately as possible.
This article is a translation of the original ‘Eenzijdige verslaggeving helpt Oeigoeren niet’, which was published in Trouw on Wednesday the 15th of June 2009.
One town
It is hard to image how the army can separate two ethnic groups in a city of approximately 2 million people. The Uyghur neighbourhood is perhaps a little poorer than much of the rest of town. It’s full of Islamic restaurants, small shops, and the Grand Bazaar. Uyghurs are known for their entrepreneurship. ‘When Neal Armstrong set foot on the moon the first person he met was a Uyghur tradesman’. You can hear this anecdote everywhere in China.
But tens of thousands to Uyghurs and other ethnic minorities don’t live in the Uyghur neighbourhood. Ürümqi is a city of traders. Kazakh, Russian, Pakistani, you can hear all of these language in one of the sprawling trade centres dotted around the city. Uyghurs that have climbed to social ladder often take up residence in the rest of town, where apartments are newer and more luxurious. Ürümqi isn’t a city of two neighborhoods that the media makes it out to be; quite the contrary in fact.
Two schools
Uyghur parents have a choice between two types of education: ‘min-kao-min’ and ‘min-kao-han’. ‘Min’ means ethnic minority, ‘han’ is Han-Chinese. ‘Kao’ is Chinese for taking exams. ‘Min-kao-min’ are school where Uyghurs are educated in their own language. At ‘min-kao-han’ schools Uyghurs receive a Chinese education together with Han students. They sit the nationwide exam. Uyghurs that have attended ‘min-kao-han’ school have better career prospects than their ‘min-kao-min’ counterparts, but traditional Uyghurs regard them with some disdain.
13 Comments
Well balanced and intelligent journalism. And that’s from someone who spent over 2 years in Urumqi and left quite recently.
Good job, Mr. Oomens!
Thanks Anthony, your comments are much appreciated.
I heard China is going to destroy Kashghar old town, I hope someone has documented that area before it disappears. This cultural vandalism is totally overlooked by international organisations.
It seems that there are reports not very responsible, however, in my view chinese government is sometimes too sensitive to criticism whether it is truth or not. It may not help to face the truth and find ways to solve the problems.
PS:I’m really sorry I can’t deal with your requirement on facebook because I can’t log in. It seems be restricted by the government.
“Xin Wen Lian Bo” is no longer the only trust-worthy resource where people get news from nowadays in China, not even dependable at all in someone’s eyes. This could to some extent show the trend. Government is losing the control of the mind. This may help for a free society, but could also give chance to those who want to transmit their own ideas in order to get benefit or cause troubles.
We would only see what we want to see, we would believe what we want to believe. It’s not wrong for the Han to say that we’ve tried our best to “help” them, but it’s also right for them to say that we are only misleading them and stealing their natural resources. It’s reasonable for Beijing to move those who live in dangerous places to new home, but also not ridiculous for someone to think it a way of “swallowing” the Uyghur culture.
Hi Joy, thanks for joining the conversation. How are you doing these days?
Jenny told me you felt that I had deleted your comment, but I’m not the Chinese government :-p Your first comment needs to be approved by me – in order to stop spam from filling up my site. Since I was in Xinjiang for the last three weeks I wasn’t able to approve it any sooner.
From now on, as long as you keep using the same e-mail address, all your comments will appear straight away. And I promise I will never ever delete any one of them
Jenny and Joy, I’ll respond to the content of your comments shortly. I’ve only just arrived back in Holland one hour ago, so give me a couple of days to deal with my unread e-mail first…
Well, Joy, I would agree, off course. I don’t think it’s necessary to fear criticism. If criticism is addressed constructively then you’ll create a lot of goodwill. So I believe anyway.
I think this is especially true in the case of the Chinese Communist Party, since I believe that the larger part of Chinese society still supports the party. This can be seen in the latest wave of protests and violence in Ürümqi. From what I understand it’s mostly Han Chinese taking to the street to protest against the government’s response to the July violence and its aftermath. Will the party listen to such criticism? That remains to be seen…
As for you, my dear Jenny, I can only repeat my statement above. The Chinese government and many Han Chinese mistakenly believe that resentment among ethnic minorities, especially the Tibetans and the Uyghurs, is only the result of economic underdevelopment in the autonomous regions. I don’t believe this is the (only) root of the problem.
It seems that the government tried their best to keep information from the public and the mess media. All we’ve got from the news was that the situation there was becoming better and better. Suppressing news which is not favorable to the government sets off a panic that people don’t know what happened and what will happen. Maybe that’s why people got irate. The resign of LiZhi perhaps could be treated as a response to such criticism. But if there are still no measures taken to warn them, more casualties will wait to be discovered.
so shall i believe that these problems root in blood, and could only be solved by blood?
So what could we resort to, how could we heal it?
Don’t you have part of the answer in here, in your very own comment?
I mean, both your two latest comments suggest that the government’s attitude remains as it is – static and rooted in ideology – and that the people won’t expect the government to change nor will the people force change within the government.
If you take that stasis for granted than I appreciate your point: these problems could only be solved by blood.
But what can the people do to change the government’s attitude? What can the people to outside of the government?
i hate this world
I don’t know. But could we consider experience of foreign countries for reference?
Solved by blood would be the worst.